Wednesday, 26 March 2014
Monday, 3 March 2014
Indigenous Beliefs of Africans
Human Spirits: Most African religions firmly believe that people continue to live, through their spirits, after death. These spirits are often referred to as ancestral spirits. It is believed that spirits of the ancestors remain very interested in what happens in their families and communities. Most African religions divide ancestral spirits into two groups:
- The Recent Dead Ancestors: After an elder dies her or his spirit remains actively interested and engaged in the life of their family and community for many years. The ancestral spirits are most concerned about the prosperity and security of their families and communities. They intercede with God on the behalf of their communities.
- The Spirits of the Long Dead: As time passes, the spirits of the recently dead gradually withdraw from the lives of their descendents and communities. It is believed that these spirits live with God. However, some ancestral spirits remain actively engaged for many generations. This is particularly true of the spirits of important individuals. For example, it is believed that the spirits of great rulers or founders of nations maintain their interest and power for a long time, perhaps centuries after their deaths. These ancestors are most interested in promoting the longevity of their kingdoms, nations, and communities.
Monday, 20 January 2014
Is history a science?
Could history be a science?
To me, i personally feel no history is not a science. This is because:-
When scientists conduct their research, they are governed by laws of
the scientific method. Progress in science rests on systematic testing,
observation, and measurement of phenomena, normally requiring that
results can be repeated if experiments are carried out with the same
conditions. This allows new knowledge to be integrated into scientific
scholarship once the validity of testing has been accepted.
Historians, by contrast, are always, dealing with information that is incomplete. Indeed, we lose more
of the raw material we need to understand the past the further away we
get from it. When we talk about new research on the past, very
frequently what we mean is a reinterpretation of the materials that
formed the evidentiary basis of older monographs.
There isn’t such a thing as “the historical method.” The reason that
popular histories don’t necessarily keep tracking developments in
scholarship the way popular sciences do, is simple. History is not
science!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)